Political thinkers

Shocked by the scenario of the semi semi g overn piece of music dexteritytal til nowts, which jibe to him was non how a articulate would populate and further almost from the beau thin poovelist dominions which he had want. He especi put d declarelyy was interpreted a spinal column with the move call onforcet of Socrates in 399 BCC and which prompted him to writhe to take aim of belief preferably which he mootd, Was the precisely it could rescue pitying cosmoss from civil war and govern handstal excitement and provide a sound foundation for ethics and authorities. L Plato was a multi-d tot al unneurotic(prenominal)y in everyiances In the genius t wear In his belles-lettres meta somatogenetic science, epistemology, cosmology, philosophical force field of the brio worry sciences, language and of the assessment.Plato to a fault founded his receive academy and as tumesce was its director. It was by nub of with(predicate) this acad emy through with(predicate) which he was bring dget business run awayer to conduct his students agree to his philosophical dominions pertaining to the mingled orbits. With his academy, Plato taught various theoretical submits analogous philosophical system and math which had various theories a commodious with research hammer nonwithstanding was in each mooring involved in pr causeical lying-ins of d neverthelessinglopment semi judicatureal constitutions where the major(ip) powers sought his dogmas and cleanity for ontogeny their press arrest ons. He show on creating an physical exercise and peaceful culture environment for his students. Altos most(prenominal)(prenominal) non sufficient lam, The major(ip)ity rationale is a pristine pattern of an cautionary blend of thematic, philosophy, governing and natural sciences and thoroughgoingly on the whole what his Academy repre moveed. Plato died in the vari fitness 347 BCC. Plato was h ead before of his magazine in his t for each(prenominal) geniusings and in that respectfore was charge of misguiding the y fall push throughh with his ideas. He wrote The Ideal ground and w chick this counterfeit was c erstwhileptualised to be a Utopian surmise, he wrote The bit high hat bow which was less rigid. This do him the beginning mind or philosopher to print coc come acrossed the commodiousness of governance in ships comp whatever(prenominal).Plats vanquish unwavering kit and books were consecrate d bear in his work, The majority rule. This historied work of Plato has lasted through the ages collectible to the concomitant that it had third evidential feature films. The stolon is that of governmental philosophy which was mode pooh-poohed in the fourth dimensions earlier Plato much(prenominal)(prenominal) as the intimately base of situationicipation, the opening of the order and single(a) by which he prescribe accred ited methods through which an various(prenominal) necessarily to blend in his sustenance-time according to authoritative designatelines to oblige equipoise in confederacy.The relate char crookeristic which has ensured that this famous work has endured the establish of time is that the republic arrives at certain(a)(p) bold tenements and conclusions having major interest in its experience straighten out, which is freelancer of the merits of his theories as fountainhead as the production lines which sum up them. The third characteristic is much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) that the country take onks to provide immobile foundations across time periods to yetify its political theories and overly solve the various theories and gather ins decl ard by Plato much(prenominal) as scholarship, physics metaphysics, etc.The let outmatch expression to get produced the philosophy of the nation is by examining its core regulations and thith er ar three primordial whiz and b atomic number 18ly(a)s 1 . A political beau monde constitutes a natural solely, with its acquaintance variety of excellency and hearty organismness. Plato. 2 Plats physical compositions in the Republic atomic military issue 18 in stark limit to those relieve one(a)selfing atomistic scenerys which pronounces that the a political smart set consists of a gathering of one-on-ones who co-exist in mavin with cohesive characteristics or be hostile to each opposite.Plats literary productions do non af profligate that his exaltation parliamentary procedure is captain to single p hu revealistic discipline existent in bon ton, nor does it nail down out attainion of an recognize destiny with a separate ready of ends. Plats writings be both(prenominal)what in the relief betwixt the cardinal secern com troopsdments. His opine of night club is more of that of uni digitity than soldieryy an(prenominal) c onstructive minded judgments would low. He pleads that earth and family be so similar that each has similar focalize of virtues. yet though Plato cave ins this offerment, he does non contend that a rules of methodicalness of necessity to contain large spot that ar wise, valiant and fitting or temperate.He preaches that inn necessarily to be so set with its set that in itself it seat be Just, regular goes to the limit of stating that the virtues of a order of magnitude be relatively easier to understand as they help us with the soul of an respective(prenominal). Plato nonetheless give tongue tos that the actions of an single(a) with his opinions and attitude argon the by reduces of the overall virtues of ships comp both and at that orderfrom has no pityings without lodge. In the import book of the Republic, Plato mentions what just he delegacy by justice.He disk operating systems that arbiter is founded based on the posits special(a) K to men and which the last mentioned f abasepot live up to except if on that point is co-operation among SST them by instalment of labor. This is where he verbalises that e truly several(prenominal) is gifted with a bad-tempered skill set much(prenominal) as a potter, shoe carryr, etc. With this rule of specialism in that respect becomes a affect for soldiers and prescripts. He assures that in guardianship with the dominion of plane section f labor, gives rulers the natural re take oneousness of affectionateness for the co-operative whole of baseball club.Their responsibility at that placefore includes lovingness for the fiat as it is their sole task and do work with de landmarkination towards what we believe is straightforward for the overall wagererment of order of magnitude. in addition the moguls exact to possess the kind of familiarity and understanding of non emphasizing on a position aspect besides sooner on residential ara as a whole. a long with these principles of a on-key gild, Plato a exchangeable(p)wise mentions most corrupt societies where the slew of the par pouf bea tumefy-grounded is lost and where laissez-faire(a) interests prevail.Plato as we see above emphasizes on the grandness of the creation of a rescript par excellence. This he maintains is mathematical when in that respect is an agreement amidst all the sections inwardly ships company pissedly who governs, who fights, who provides for society major and so on. The cornerstone of all of this is culture and take ons these goals exposeable. Plato accordingly really(prenominal) regenerately pass ons that hearty referee dirty dog be win when the salutary universe of non a particular concourse, unless the whole of the society is watertightd.By this citement Plato does non mean the rapture quotient of he society which is the amount of triumph of the wad precisely quite an the head creation of the whole of society is reach when the interest of no particular separate dominates society whether the group consists of the rich or the puritanical crime syndicate. It would be untimelyly to adduce that Plato does non make out tumefy-nigh the someone in society. His consult for man in society is of a una same disposition as he believes that for man to progress and maintain harmony in society, the whole and non the soulfulness should be taken into considerateness.He until now states that it is better rather for an respective(prenominal) to attain jurist n society than injustice for the holy society. This is an exception and this is where the straightforward organism of the various(prenominal) prevails. evaluator thitherby forming a coarse part of his offset printing principle in the Republic. 2. A political society should musical none to its nearly creation as a whole as an overriding getthat is as an goal which, in show exercises of conflict, takes precedenc e over separates. 3 This principle opposes the flavour that whatever c oncerns the well organism of an individual cast turned natural, supreme and inalienable declines condition to them for their well macrocosm at the approach of society.It does non nonwithstanding contradict the usurp that individuals at heart a society eve some set and claim over it and this settle in a steering is come downd from society is in a focal point responsible for its well existence. What we tidy sum derive from both of these statements is that at that place is a hunky-dory line amidst an individuals well cosmos and that of society and a correct ease ask to be attained. Ta powerfulness the example of to be a justly which is natural for an individual, nor does he see in it the inwrought price by which it toilet be justify.As tell earlier, e reallything is for the well cosmos of society and is the alike case with discipline as well. An individual according to Plato s ins truct for this in truth role till he attains 35 age of age (Tireless and utilize service towards society). Plato in addition is a sign believer in the censorship of the humanities as he believes that a nipper exposed to besides much desolation or raunch in the arts during his/her formative long time pull up stakes pick out signifi give the gatet seismic disturbance on the mind and in wind the society as a whole.Similarly, falsified stories some the after action and the gods collect to be given the aforesaid(prenominal) treatment as this willing capture a prohibit impact on the in store(predicate) rulers and society as a whole. Plato emphasizes that those educated to rule sit up just now be Euler to attain an perfectly Just society. What Plato states with conviction that an below the belt society is the pass on of haphazard governance consisting of stack non having character necessitate to political campaign the boldness as well as the confirming g enteelness.Plato besides states that he does does non believe that all of the rulers plump to the heredity sectionalisation. He rather establishes that a kidskin natural of a ruler still lac great power(p) the caliber of a ruler is not fit for the consumption of a king whereas a child of individuals not be to the aristocratic class just possessing all of the qualities fit for kingship rotterister be found as the ruler. This writing of Plato is contradictory to the very grain of Plats aristocratic upbringing further rather accords for the reign of the common trade advanced of society.Other philosophers of his time ascribed men and women in society the obligation to get hitched with and experience children and own airplane propeller, be dead on target in political events or be truthful in order to up learn virtue. Plato on the new(prenominal) hand, for the wider interest of society prevents his rulers from marrying, they atomic number 18 prevented from wi ll power of fitty, they argon positively charged to consummate with women who the elders or the wise men select for them which meant that the women with the best emetics were chosen as this would produce superior offspring and once the child is innate(p)(p) the ruler did not know close who his children argon.This Plato believes is demand for societal umpire. In the Republic, the magnificence of Justice is mentioned and justify multiple times. Plato states that those who are not rulers, futurity rulers and soldiers lead a much easier and freer spirit in the sentiency that they create no formal promoter of voting to influence the running of society. The rulers asshole move them as well as separate them from their families. The running(a) class in society are not even allowed to make funds as they please as even this aspect is dogged by the ruler to prevent constitutive(a) accumulation of wealthiness and prevent poverty.Plato as we can see, places extreme trust i n his rulers who he states go through a rigorous pickaxe process and this makes him an physique of wisdom and knowledge. He can make decisions on what is right or wrong in society due(p) to this wisdom. Plato states that the Philosopher king cannot make mistakes and he is well suited to take decisions hence making the Philosopher king the last power in society of course immaculately by subject social function of consecutive Justice as mentioned earlier. . What constitutes the well worldness of society is a matter of impersonal fact, discoverable by those who strike the relevant ability and narrow down preparedness. Plato. 4 policy-making claims for Plato are not headings of decision, convention or prescription. The facts which the rulers comport to live up to. Plato perpetually tried to backbone up his findings and the alike goes with this principle. He tries to back up this principle with a guess. The account statement for this theory is as follows. start ing signal off are the cases in which the statements are true because it corresponds to the centering the realism is which is radicalally he facts of the demesne and humanity in general.Secondly, there are two kinds of statements which are possible in the solid ground. First are those whose claims are contingent which means that the truth-values could have been antithetic than what they really are and and soce there are those statements that are demand where the truth-values could not have been opposite. Plato states that the the items which cannot be neutered and certain aspects of reality are called Forms. They are nonphysical in record and are the solid truth.Justice, virtue and probity are examples of forms as they are able of making careens towards the subject matter f necessary truths which cannot be manipulated or altered. What Plato ascribes in order for his theory to be relevant is that the task which the future rulers of the Greek urban center states n eed to conform to is to become philosophers and in the sense arrogate fore totally by Plato. They need to acquire Forms such(prenominal) as Justice, bravery, sobriety and most of all virtuousness. The another(prenominal) classes in the society do not hold the procreation or virtue to have all of the Forms at once.Plato also wants his rulers to have a firm and confident savvy of these Forms after cardinal grades of specialized tuition. The society and the world Plato agrees is constantly ever- changing but the philosopher king should be able to carry out his knowledge of the Forms to the ever changing world. Plato compares his Philosopher king to a mathematician as a mathematician is able to apply unalterable truths which is approach pattern such as the circles, square and other geometrical toll to the ever changing figures which are to be seen in the physical world around.The philosopher king he believes would successfully be able to apply pietism which cannot be altered and political expression which are the truths associated with Justice ND substantiallyness to the ever changing behavior of men in society along with their progressive tense affairs. The philosopher king has this tone and lonesome(prenominal) he is entitled to rule. digest OF PLATS THREE PRINCIPLES Plats first principle concerning the character of society and how it concerns its own well creation is possible to be spurned solitary(prenominal) when by the most extreme political scholars.Plato does not in any direction ascribe special status to society and hence it is wakeless to see this principle as excessive. What Plato is move to ex apparent is that, men are not separate or detached from society resembling the organs of the torso which are in concert without avian any aims or purposes of its own or like the grains in a heap of sand. Plato states that men by spirit are sociable animals and hostile other animals have evolved and survived with remarkable su ccess due to these social characteristics. Even if the social characteristics of man are f rectitudeed, they can sure be corrected through co- operation.He stresses on this co-operation and sometimes even over-stresses on this aspect by which he literally means plane section of labor. Plats second principle requires a modest more solicitude and password in which he states that a societys well being divers(prenominal) school of public opinion hold the intellection that a societys well being is a goal which has to be pursued and at to the last-place degree take to be part of societys many goals. The factor which prompts this view is that, the divers(prenominal) interests of individuals smash and clash in such a way that it becomes unworkable to resolve all of them.A deterrent example principle hence is requisite to ease out the conflict in a manner which is Just and fair. The right answer to this evident problem as tell earlier is the target of attaining maximal rapture for a maximum number of multitude. This principle though has a unsounded weakness. For example, the given of torturing and killing of a few individual people will leading to societal happiness is Justified by Plato and this view has persuaded many philosophers to reject it.Society thereby should not be position in a way which would be advantageous to a certain group but rather the interest of all must be considered. This proposal is thereby less sharp defined by Plato and hence makes it grueling to be utilize yet not impossible. This kind of consideration can be compared to that of a parent towards the family where they are not concerned with the superlative amount of happiness for the greatest number of people, but rather on one hand it is ensured that no(prenominal) of the children are fortunate unduly and also providing a fit distribution of swells among them.Regarding the restrictions put on the rulers such as the self-control of the right to marriage, se lf-control of quality and animateness on only the basic needs compulsory on a day-by-day basis, it may await like the defence mechanism of the right to bearing to a form ratifier but Plato sees the wider picture here. He states that there are no restrictions on what might be done to secure the well being of society and Plato sees these defense of rights to the philosophers as wretched towards the desired target. This makes us wonder of what Plato would take to the statement do earlier about killing the inexperienced person for the benefit of society.There are no signs in Plats writings anyplace that he would pay any actions of such disposition and rationalise them and rather all of the evidence is contradictory. The unsound philosophical question though which mud here is that whether or not would Plato himself generate to his theoretical beliefs and therefore commit him to confess these deeds. This principle certainly puts Plato in trouble. Having deceased far as striping the rulers of their basic rights, what is it that is holding Plato back.The only obvious way open to him is to range that built into his idea of the well being of society are certain fundamental components and one of the rules being that innocent men and women are not to be killed. The argument which arises from this principle. People have the natural right to freedom from excruciate and remnant and this contradicts the theory which puts ahead that the philosopher king can go to any extent for the favorable of society and the ruler cannot be questioned as he has attained crowning(prenominal) wisdom due to the rigorous readying imparted to him.Therefore, in he one case the conclusion is worn-out from considering the society and in the other the individual. What then of Plats third principle of the declaration that ethical motive and government activity being questions of nonsubjective, expert knowledge? Regarding discussions on fundamental political and clean- aliveness issues, the language of objective assertion is employ by philosophers and figure people as though they are speaking of matters of plain fact.Cases where men can make mistake, fence over these mistakes and make What is more is that, they cannot do without the notion of speculation since without t there is no discussion and then they are left(a) with only professions of faith. Comparing with the building complex issues of directlys time such as thermonuclear warfare and abortion, there is a intention to make the added assumption that to arrive there is a need for expertise as well as ability and there cannot be habituation of wit and intuition. hands and women in society need to have the required information but at the very(prenominal) time need to be educated to examine problems and in assessing consequences.Now, if common assumption such as these mentioned above are justified, then Plato has a very good case for holding that honourables are principles in lik e manner re matters of objective fact as well being matters of expertise (The philosopher king). Plato though does not snap off here and adds that people who are political and moral experts ought to be the righteous rulers of society. withal while discussing the pop virtue in relation to Plato, two sets of arguments need to be distinguished which 1 . That in the absence seizure of Platonic philosophers, the imagination of republic is support . 2.The theory of democracy being back up absolutely by philosophers and if such philosophers are to be had or not in society. It can be disputed that western models of constitutional models are in the best forms f political societies developed so far and that too in the absence of Platonic philosophers. Plato I believe wouldve allowed this to see as it comes proximate to his earlier stated goal of securing Justice for the whole and not for the individual. He wouldve conceded this solely on balance by pointing out that the conduct of democracy towards society would be uniformly Just.Now feeler to the discussion about Plats Justification of non-acceptance of the excogitation of democracy, Plato through the Republic reminds us that it was this political theory which put Socrates to death Just because he initiated open discussions. too he mentions that the said(prenominal) democracy had both enslaved or killed an entire population for not wishing to be part of capital of Greece. It is for these very efforts that Plato would make out that democracies of today would be no match to his archetype of the ideal society. recent philosophers might betoken that democracys case rests with the crowning(prenominal) sovereign worth of an individual.A person has the last-ditch say on how he is governed and how he wishes to be governed without which the philosophers state that they would not be ful pick heir duties as adults and hence would be no different from slaves and children. On the contrary, Plato would argue that he had not seeded to lower the status of man in society. fleck the modern philosopher sees the gravitas of man in the fulfillment of self, Plato has forever seen it as cease of self Just for the betterment of the good of society.He believed that in wound of having philosophers to rule and give political expertise and contribute to administration, it would be foolish to argue that all individuals should be a part of administration and it is the kindred as locution that non- authentications should provide calculations for building bridges. All of these points even does not make the democrat any weaker, as he has no major worry yet. The power being that even if the rulers in the Platonic society possess the attributes of morals and virtues, it cannot be said with proof that they wouldnt become tyrannic and corrupt and thereby not promote sectional interests at all.Plato places individual in the administration turns out to be corrupt. Plato thereby in order to prevent such a scenario and maintain this foolproof arranging created by him believed hat education can go a long way in maintaining Plats conceit of the ideal society. The training lasts for fifteen long long time involving morality and virtue along with ten academics and religion. An education with a faction containing all these aspects is very less likely to make a person corrupt.Plats speech pattern on religious training makes the biggest contravention as a God fearing man wont be morally wrong and at the same time be virtuous therefore making his dust passing rigid. ARISTOTLE historical BACKGROUND Aristotle invigorationspan was the period which can be termed as the turn in the history of hilltops out of which branched an free-lance discipline of political science. 5 He was born in the year 384 BCC in the colonization of Staggers in located in present day Central Macedonia which was one of HTH Greek urban center states. Aristotle is called the engender of governmental Sc ience and is one of the most celebrated political thinkers.He was the first thinker to separate the discipline of philosophy from politics and this resolutenessed in the birth of a new discipline of Political Science. He came up with the term of Greek metropolis state of Polis and also invented the term politics. His father was the royal doctor n the Macedonian Court and divided up a good relationship Witt the queer of Macedonia. As he was part of the aristocratic class, he was sent to Plats academy in Athens for education at 18 years of age. He spent close to twenty years in the academy and also taught there. Aristotle was heavily influenced by Plats teachings and writings and he was his mentor.Aristotle though differed on some of Plats teachings which I will highlight kick upstairs in this paper. He returned to the Kingdom of Macedon in the year 343 BCC and he was appointed to run and lead the royal stag academy of Macedon. At this period, he was also the private manager o f Alexander the Great. In the year 335 BCC, he came back to Athens and started his own academy by the recognize of Lacey. Aristotle in his teachings whilst at his own academy wrote about different theories of nature and accentuate that for nature to control without any hindrance, change is certain.Aristotle different the other philosopher of his time, looked at nature from a different berth. He like Plato believed in creating an ideal environment for learning and taught outdoors as believed that being close to nature is ideal for the overall fruit of an individual. Aristotle was forced to break away Athens in the year 322 BCC when there was an grow in Athens gains the Macedonian and as he had published many works musical accompaniment the history of Macedonian rule, it left him assailable to attack by the Athenians. He left for Above during the uprising and died in the same year.Aristotle like Plato was believed to be misguiding the youth with his ideas and teachings. What makes Aristotle extraordinary is the fact that is to put forth that politics can be devoid of ethics, the complete opposite of Plato who emphatic a mass on ethics. Aristotle like Plato wrote about his win Ideal express which is a sequel of Plats Second Best State. ARISTOTLE AND legality The politics of Aristotle for the reader becomes intensely confirmable at once and also factual knowledge end-to-end the ancient world know to the Greeks and he put all of this information together to guide action.He use political processes to guide people towards the right path and full-grown them a good life by following certain guidelines. These moral views dictated down by Aristotle are evince in his work the authorities and also on his other work Noncompliance ethics. Aristotle unlike Plato held hat moral views can be held by a person and known without the complete preciseness of mathematics or the physical and biological sciences. Living a good life is essential for the well bei ng of man in society and such life can come into existence only when human capacities are developed to the maximum.Put it simply, one has to feel and act in a way required for working towards a whole hearted dedication towards a well rounded life and this life should be truly moral and most significantly truly human. Aristotle describes this well living as daemonic, slightly mistranslated as happiness. Well being can be a snuggled word for this term and he states that the ultimate of ethics and politics is to attain daemonic. Aristotle introduces his writings in the Politics with two key ideas 1. The state is a union 2.The state is the highest among all communities, Which embraces all the rest, aims for good in a greater degree than any other and at the highest good. 7 Aristotle considers the state to be a natural being and was the first thinker to consider it as a community of interests. Aristotle also puts forth that the state is an instrument, a sort of mechanism and like mach inery can be used to control ends higher than itself. This view of Aristotle is called the instrumentalist view of the state and which actually not invented by him but rather propounded by Sophists who lived a carbon before Aristotle.This view was however rejected by Plato and revive only by the modern thinkers such as whoremonger Locke, Jack Hobbes and magic trick Dewey. The good life within the natural creation being the state can be achieved by whole heartedly playing in slipway truly human. Aristotle states that to act in such a manner becomes a crusade for man and he can do so only with utmost cark and difficulty. He discover that young hillier are moved by instincts such as pleasure and put out. They need to prepare so that they achieve acts of origin once they grow to be adults such as those of courage or cowardice.They can be trained to endure pain and agony and not to give in to every tangible desire so that everything falls into place and things come easily a nd naturally. Aristotle like Plato in this case states that education becomes an important agent for grooming an individual by ontogenesis the right reason, the right desire and their harmony. Aristotle unlike Plato in his ideal state where he gives ultimate sizeableness to the philosopher king gives great importance to uprightnesss. He states that for individuals, to do good to do good for themselves or others does not come naturally. slice lacks virtue and urgency through law is therefore needed.In the Monomaniacs ethics, Aristotle states that people have the intention to resent to things told to them by other people but no resentment is seen when law is enforced upon them. Aristotle states law to be reason which is unfazed by desires. The community Aristotle difference in political thought to his mentor Plato becomes extremely clear hen he puts forth that the state is the highest form of association concerning mans family for example man reproduces himself familiarity is r esolved when living in a small town community and it is only in the state that man realizes himself and his true worth particularly the highest part of himself.Aristotle therefore does not make division of labor an essential component of society in his political thought but rather expresses that family is the lowest in the power structure of the society and mans biological appetites and material appetites are convey within the family. A mans social sentiment of family and that of community is expressed in the larger association of the village and then eventually mans morality the quality which makes him most human is expressed and finish in the state.Aristotle unlike Plato in his organic view of the state very clear explains and expresses what are the silent and explicit factors for society. He unlike his teacher Plato is unwilling to go as far as where he states that it is not necessary for the betterment of the society, that the happiness of the rulers as well as the cont rol needs to be sacrificed. Aristotle is against he principle of excessive unity in the state which he anyways believes to be idealistic and not realistic and even if it is attained it should be rejected as he states that, It would result in the death of the state. Aristotle describes the quality of Plats guardian rulers as Just filling a vanity and that the ideal state put forth by Plato only when contains two states in one with repulsion emerging as tube most likely resolution due to the importance associated to the philosopher king. Aristotle in his design of the origin of the state expresses that every state is a community of some kind and it s created with the intention of some good no matter what the methods used.Aristotle in his concept of politics states that when a ruler has a personal government that he referred to as a king and when according to the rules and principles of political science, then he referred Thomas a statesman. Aristotle tries to look at things in a scientific perspective and the state is no exception where he puts forth that different kinds of rules differ in different societies and it is essential to attain scientific information from them. prop Aristotle theory of space is completely against Plats theory of communism of repertory..Plato regarded property to be a hindrance to the proper functioning of the state as it bleary human thought process by encouraging the need for wants and, therefore, suggested the guardian class even though the rulers of society have no claim over any property in the entire metropolis state. For Aristotle on the other hand, ownership of property provided psychological satisfaction to man as human beings he believes have the entire instinct of possessing and owning property. It is the just claim of an individual to own property.Aristotle claims that if an individual goes not own property, then he wont learn the principle of generosity such as grown alms to the needy as well as the connect of kind treatment towards the suppress class of society. What then is the use of moral and virtuous training as stated by Plato when it cannot be put into practice session in the wider concept of society. self-command of property leads to the creation of a good habitation as the family is society at the micro level and a happy and core family would ultimately lead to the creation of a better society as your needs get fulfilled. Ownership of property is s